Voice from the rooftop logo
Menu
  • World
  • India
  • USA
  • Sports/Games/Cricket
  • Media
  • Education
  • Christianity
  • Corruption
  • Terrorism
Menu

Justice International

Posted on July 3, 2012 by Vincent Augustine D'Souza

I announce the founding of Justice International. I am the founder and president.

The aim is to get justice to victims and their families. Those who wish to join can write to vincent@go4quiz.com

We will fight for death penalty in all countries for all cases of murder, attempted murder, abduction, acid throwing, hijacking, kidnapping, piracy and such high crimes. Death penalty should not be restricted to rarest of rare cases. It is immaterial how much time has passed after the crime. It is ridiculous to say a murderer should be hanged within one year but should not be hanged if a long time has passed. It is immaterial whether the criminal has reformed or not. We will see that death penalty is restored in Canada, European Union, Russia, Mexico, South Africa and such countries.

We will fight for consecutive sentences for crimes instead of concurrent sentences. If a person had committed ten murders the punishment should be ten death sentences. It is immaterial that a criminal can be hanged only once. If punishment for one case of cheating is one year imprisonment, for ten cases of cheating it should be ten years imprisonment, for 180 cases of cheating it should be 180 years imprisonment. If punishment for one rape is 25 years, punishment for 10 rapes should be 250 years.

We will fight for proportional punishment for crimes. If punishment for taking a bribe of 100 rupees is one day, punishment for taking a bribe of one crore rupees should be one lakh days.

We will fight for quick justice.

We will fight for abolition of parole and furlough. Many criminals who come out on parole and furlough do not return to prisons.

Courts are for justice. We will fight for punishment to lawyers who know their clients have committed crimes but try to prove otherwise.

It is a shame that victims cry and criminals laugh. It is a shame that Pratibha Patil commuted death sentences of 35 murderers to life. Her excuse that the decisions were of government does not work because when the home ministry wanted her to reject mercy petitions she refused to do so and home ministry agreed to commutation. It was well known long back and I had written to many MPs to impeach her but I did not have any success. She even refused to reject mercy petition of Afzal Guru. Now she should reverse her decisions or her successor should reverse her decisions. Rajendra Prasad had reversed a decision to grant clemency and the murderer was hanged.

It is a shame that journalists like Barkha Dutt manipulate TV programmes to oppose death penalty. The discussions have a large number of people who oppose death penalty and token presence of those who favour death penalty. May be she acts at the behest of Nira Radia or some other lobbyist.

Victims like Manish Tewari, Neelam Katara, Sangeeta Khanna, Ritu Mathur and Chamanlal Mattoo should speak in favour of death penalty. Manish Tewari should move a bill in Lok Sabha making death penalty obligatory in all cases of murder.

Meenakshi Lekhi should expose lobbyists who oppose death penalty. Pinky Anand should continue to defend death penalty. Arnab Goswami has defended death penalty.

When mercy petitions are decided family members of all who were murdered be asked their views. In Sriperumbadur blast 16 people died including Rajiv Gandhi. When deciding on Nalini’s mercy petition, Sonia Gandhi’s view was considered and death sentence was commuted to life but members of other 15 people were not consulted. This is against equality before law.

We will take on abolitionists and self-styled human rights activists who oppose death penalty. For them murderers are human beings, victims and their family members are not human beings. We will refute their arguments. We will refute their argument that life sentence is a greater punishment than death sentence. We will refute their argument that state has no right to take life.

There are different categories among people who oppose death penalty. Some do it because they think it is fashionable or politically correct. Some have heard others to say that so they repeat. Some are evil and we will unmask them.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alpabharata by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
Alpabharata by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
Dream Novel Vincent Augustibe D'Souza
Pope Novel Vincent Augustibe D'Souza
King Novel Vincent Augustibe D'Souza

Recent Posts

  • Wrestlers Protest
  • Joshimath Sinking
  • Argentina Football Champions 2022
  • Eva Kaili Arrest
  • AAP National Party

Recent Comments

  • Matheikal on Joshimath Sinking
  • Matheikal on PFI Ban
  • Matheikal on Hijab Burning
  • Matheikal on Two Elizabeths Rule UK
  • Matheikal on Doomed Beyond Redemption

Categories

  • America (50)
  • Christianity (33)
  • Corruption (45)
  • Cricket (59)
  • Education (14)
  • General (75)
  • India (783)
  • Media (32)
  • Pakistan (20)
  • Sports and Games (30)
  • Terrorism (30)
  • World (68)

RSS Go 4 Quiz

  • Indiana Quiz
  • Arizona Quiz
  • Charles Bronson Quiz
  • Japan Quiz
  • Amerigo Vespucci Quiz
  • US Open 2012 Quiz
  • Pablo Neruda Quiz
  • Jharkhand Quiz
  • Wisconsin Quiz
  • Central African Republic Quiz
Model Constitution for India by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
Model Constitution for India by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
English-Konkani Dictionary by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
English-Konkani Dictionary by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
Model Constitution for the United States of America by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
Model Constitution for the United States of America by Vincent Augustine D'Souza
©2023 Voice from the rooftop