Voice from the Rooftop

Blog of Vincent Augustine D'Souza

Tag: Pakistan

IPL and Pakistan

On 19 January 2010 during the IPL auction none of the 11 Pakistan players was picked up by any of the eight franchisee teams. This set off reactions in Pakistan.
Lalit Modi, IPL Commissioner, said teams did not select any Pakistan player and only one player from Australia was selected. Team owners said they were not convinced of the availability of Pakistani players for the entire season or they had some other players in mind and such things. It was clear it was decided beforehand not to bid for Pakistani players. Pakistani players had faced visa problems in December 2009. That was the foretaste of things to come. If Pakistani players were not to be selected they should not have been included in the list. Pakistani players were angry. Many Pakistanis were angry and considered it insult of Pakistan. Pakistan had won 2020 championship in 2009. Pakistan cancelled the visit of its parliamentary delegation to India. Pakistani sports minister spoke to India’s sports minister Mohinder Singh Gill who said IPL is a commercial enterprise and the government has nothing to do with it. Lalit Modi’s effigy was burnt in Pakistan.
The repercussions of not bidding for Pakistani players seem to affect many things other than cricket. There was talk of Pakistan boycotting Hockey World Cup in India but the idea was given up as it is a World Federation event. IPL telecast will not be allowed in Pakistan. There is demand to ban Indian films. Pakistan Kabaddi Federation cancelled India tour. Pakistan team was to play five matches in Inida.
Not many believe that the Government of India had nothing to do with the non-selection of Pakistani players. In 2009 Pakistan did not allow its players to play in IPL due to security reasons. If it had been announced before hand that Pakistani players will not be part of the auction due to security reasons it would not have been a problem. It could have been done in December by refusing visas. They were given visas after due date and were hopeful that they will be selected for IPL.
The controversy was avoidable. Care should be taken that such things do not happen in the future.
Link to e-book King – a novel: http://go4quiz.com/vincent/king

Partition was not pleasant

Jaithirtha Rao’s article “Let’s wish them well” in Indian Express on 29/9/2007 was amusing.
Jaithirtha Rao thinks partition was good and is grateful to the British. Pakistan is a buffer state that protects India from Afghanistan and Iran.
Pakistan is not a buffer state. It will be offended at such a description. It wants Kashmir. It fought wars with India. It supports terrorists in Kashmir and calls them freedom fighters.
Partition resulted more than one crore people being displaced. Many were murdered. Many lost their property. Many women were murdered by their family members to prevent them from falling in the hands of enemies.
If Pakistan disintegrates nothing will happen to India. If refugees come they will return as happened with Bangladeshi refugees.
India not being able to deal with Naga, Naxal and other insurrections is a different matter. If India had not been partitioned the money spent by India and Pakistan against each other would have been better utilized. Many lives would have been saved. States would have had more powers.
Why should India be useful to USA and UK? Are USA and UK useful to India? USA trained many people to fight against USSR in Afghanistan. Some of them turned against USA.
Some Germans who were about to carry out terrorist activities were caught. They were trained in Pakistan. London’s July 7 bombers were trained in Pakistan.
The people of the sub-continent are still paying a heavy price for partition.

Page 4 of 41234
Voice from the Rooftop | Vincent Augustine D'Souza © 2005-2018 Frontier Theme