Tag: Law and Order in India

Justice International

I announce the founding of Justice International. I am the founder and president.

The aim is to get justice to victims and their families. Those who wish to join can write to vincent@go4quiz.com

We will fight for death penalty in all countries for all cases of murder, attempted murder, abduction, acid throwing, hijacking, kidnapping, piracy and such high crimes. Death penalty should not be restricted to rarest of rare cases. It is immaterial how much time has passed after the crime. It is ridiculous to say a murderer should be hanged within one year but should not be hanged if a long time has passed. It is immaterial whether the criminal has reformed or not. We will see that death penalty is restored in Canada, European Union, Russia, Mexico, South Africa and such countries.

We will fight for consecutive sentences for crimes instead of concurrent sentences. If a person had committed ten murders the punishment should be ten death sentences. It is immaterial that a criminal can be hanged only once. If punishment for one case of cheating is one year imprisonment, for ten cases of cheating it should be ten years imprisonment, for 180 cases of cheating it should be 180 years imprisonment. If punishment for one rape is 25 years, punishment for 10 rapes should be 250 years.

We will fight for proportional punishment for crimes. If punishment for taking a bribe of 100 rupees is one day, punishment for taking a bribe of one crore rupees should be one lakh days.

We will fight for quick justice.

We will fight for abolition of parole and furlough. Many criminals who come out on parole and furlough do not return to prisons.

Courts are for justice. We will fight for punishment to lawyers who know their clients have committed crimes but try to prove otherwise.

It is a shame that victims cry and criminals laugh. It is a shame that Pratibha Patil commuted death sentences of 35 murderers to life. Her excuse that the decisions were of government does not work because when the home ministry wanted her to reject mercy petitions she refused to do so and home ministry agreed to commutation. It was well known long back and I had written to many MPs to impeach her but I did not have any success. She even refused to reject mercy petition of Afzal Guru. Now she should reverse her decisions or her successor should reverse her decisions. Rajendra Prasad had reversed a decision to grant clemency and the murderer was hanged.

It is a shame that journalists like Barkha Dutt manipulate TV programmes to oppose death penalty. The discussions have a large number of people who oppose death penalty and token presence of those who favour death penalty. May be she acts at the behest of Nira Radia or some other lobbyist.

Victims like Manish Tewari, Neelam Katara, Sangeeta Khanna, Ritu Mathur and Chamanlal Mattoo should speak in favour of death penalty. Manish Tewari should move a bill in Lok Sabha making death penalty obligatory in all cases of murder.

Meenakshi Lekhi should expose lobbyists who oppose death penalty. Pinky Anand should continue to defend death penalty. Arnab Goswami has defended death penalty.

When mercy petitions are decided family members of all who were murdered be asked their views. In Sriperumbadur blast 16 people died including Rajiv Gandhi. When deciding on Nalini’s mercy petition, Sonia Gandhi’s view was considered and death sentence was commuted to life but members of other 15 people were not consulted. This is against equality before law.

We will take on abolitionists and self-styled human rights activists who oppose death penalty. For them murderers are human beings, victims and their family members are not human beings. We will refute their arguments. We will refute their argument that life sentence is a greater punishment than death sentence. We will refute their argument that state has no right to take life.

There are different categories among people who oppose death penalty. Some do it because they think it is fashionable or politically correct. Some have heard others to say that so they repeat. Some are evil and we will unmask them.

Hemraj murder case

Hemraj and Aarushi were murdered. People refer to the case as Aarushi murder case. Hemraj is forgotten.

The case has seen many twists. After Aarushi was found murdered it was said that Hemraj was missing. He was the suspect. Next day his body was found on the terrace.

Rajesh Talwar was the suspect. A police officer called a press conference and said Rajesh Talwar had found Aarushi and Hemraj in an objectionable position, not a compromising position.

Supporters of Rajesh Talwar cried foul. There was a demand to hand over the case to CBI and it happened. The CBI officer let off Rajesh Talwar. Three servants were arrested. Narco tests were done. Attempts were made to put words in their mouths and frame them. There was no evidence against the three.

Years passed. Another officer came. He came to the conclusion that Rajesh Talwar and Nupur Talwar were murderers but that could not be proved. He filed closure report.

There were four people in the house. Two were murdered. Nobody came from outside. The two who remained were guilty. Rajesh Talwar and Nupur Talwar committed murders or one of them committed murders and another abetted in cover-up. As said by fictional detective Sherlock Holmes, “When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

The Talwars were happy that CBI had filed closure report. They pretended they were outraged. They did not know they were suspects.

The court refused to accept closure report and told CBI to pursue the case. The Talwars went on appeals repeatedly and delayed the process. They could hire expensive lawyers. They had friends who appeared on TV channels and defended them.

Nupur Talwar skipped court appearance on 11/4/2012. The special CBI court at Ghaziabad issued a non-bailable warrant against her. CBI went to arrest her. She could not be found at her residence. CBI sent people to different places to find her.

Nupur Talwar appealed in Supreme Court on 12/4/2012 through her lawyer. She did not get bail. She was asked to appear in court. CBI was not prevented from arresting her. She appeared in Supreme Court the next day. The bench comprising Justices B. S. Chauhan and J. S. Shekhar rejected her bail.

What followed was mind boggling. Within minutes of rejection another bench comprising A. K. Patnaik and another judge took up the case of Nupur Talwar. They restrained CBI from arresting Nupur Talwar. They said we have to protect Nupur Talwar. They said the case will go before a bench headed by CJI S. H. Kapadia. CBI said they knew the whereabouts of Nupur Talwar but they had not arrested her.

A. K. Patnaik is a disgrace and a shame. He had no business to take up Nupur Talwar’s petition. Judges like him pervert the system. There will be anarchy. CJI should stop him from functioning. CBI could have gone back to B. S. Chauhan and J. S. Shekhar and they could have said “Who is A. K. Patnaik? Arrest Nupur Talwar right now right here.”

Parliament should start removal procedure against him. Removal is not enough. Law must be changed to hang A. K. Patnaik. He and his associate are like two evil judges in the Book of Daniel. Those two judges framed an innocent woman and sent her to death and Daniel saved her. Here the Supreme Court judges saved a criminal.

On 18/4/2012 in CBI court CBI sought and got extension of non-bailable warrant up to 30/4/2012 and said they will not arrest Nupur Talwar until CJI transfers the case to a bench. A lawyer told the journalists CBI should assume its responsibility and arrest Nupur Talwar. There is no stay on arrest from CBI court, High Court or Supreme Court. CBI is playing a double game. They say they want to arrest Nupur Talwar but do not arrest her.

Sometime back a High Court judge said CBI should be shut down. If CBI knew the whereabouts of Nupur Talwar they should have arrested her. Their search on 11/4/2012 was a farce.

Removal of bad Supreme Court and High Court judges should be an easy process. CBI officers who frame innocent people should be held accountable.

Some chief ministers talk of NCTC being in violation of constitution and federal structure. When Supreme Court or a High Court orders a case to be investigated by CBI it is a violation of constitution and federal structure.

Shame on lawyers who represent and people who defend the Talwars.

Tuesday the 11th Terrorist strikes

There are people who oppose death penalty to a terrorist even when the terrorist does not challenge his conviction and does not file a mercy petition. The jailor refuses to execute court’s order to hang him. The state government files a mercy petition.

Imagine a situation. A terrorist enters the studio of NDTV when We the people is telecast live. He shoots Barkha Dutt, Colin Gonsalves, K. C. Singh, Praveen Swami, Mani Shankar Aiyar, Ram Jethmalani, Majeed Memon, Naresh Gujral and so on. The terrorist goes to Kashmir, kills Governor, MLAs and High Court judges. The terrorist goes to Assam, kills Governor, MLAs and High Court judges. The terrorist goes to Tamil Nadu, kills Governor, MLAs and High Court judges. The terrorist goes to Punjab, kills Governor, MLAs and High Court judges. When MLAs are killed chief minister and other ministers are killed.

The terrorist is arrested. He says “My mission is incomplete. Next time I will succeed. I will kill President, Vice President, MPs, Supreme Court judges, Governors, High Court judges, MLAs and MLCs wherever they are. When MPs are killed prime minister and other ministers are killed.” The terrorist is prosecuted. He says he did not commit any crime. He killed evil people and their collaborators. Some deaths were collateral damage. He is found guilty by Sessions Court. He does not file any appeal. Someone files a PIL in High Court. High Court convicts him. Another person files a PIL in Supreme Court. From Sessions Court to High Court to Supreme Court he is sentenced to death. The terrorist does not file a mercy petition. Someone files a mercy petition. President rejects it. Date is set for hanging. Then someone goes to High Court challenging the rejection. He says the President took one year to decide on the mercy petition. Before that the terrorist was in prison for four years. Five years is too long a time to wait for hanging. The High Court stays the execution. The terrorist escapes from prison.

It is Tuesday the 11th. The terrorist is sitting in a bunker. Parliament, Legislative Assemblies and Legislative Councils are in session. The terrorist gives a command on his computer. Missiles carrying neutron bombs fly. Delhi and state capitals are hit. Those bombs kill people but leave buildings intact. People in Rashtrapati Bhavan, Parliament House, Supreme Court, Governors’ Houses, Legislative Buildings, High Courts and many other buildings are dead. There are discussions on TV channels. Someone says “It was intelligence failure, not operational failure.” Another person says “The terrorist had told he will kill those people. Why was it not taken seriously?” Someone says “What do we do now? There is no president, prime minister, ministers and Supreme Court judges. There are no governors, chief ministers, ministers and high court judges. There are no MPs and MLAs and MLCs.” One panelist says to another “You went to High Court against his hanging. If he had been hanged my uncle would have been alive today. Shame on you.”

The anchor says “We have Breaking News. The terrorist is addressing the nation.” The channel switches to the speech.

“Friends, Indians, Countrymen,

Lend me your ears. I am your leader, Chief Executive.

Do not cry for the people who are dead. They were dishonourable people.

The choice was between country and democracy. What we called democracy was bad for the country. I have uploaded a new constitution on the government web site.

Politicians followed the policy of divide and rule. They made some Indians like SCs, STs, OBCs, women more equal others. India had become like George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Now all are equal. A few people benefitted at the expense of 121 crore people. They borrowed thousands of crores of rupees from banks and did not repay them while 121 crore people had to pay more taxes. Never in the history of the world so few people benefitted at the cost of so many people.

There was no justice. People went to court and got dates. Cases dragged on for years. Victims cried. Criminals laughed. They got stay orders and went in appeals. Prosecution lawyers joined together with defence lawyers. Some managed judges. Witnesses turned hostile. Evidence disappeared. When they were convicted they went to hospitals or got parole. CBI did the farce of searching for an absconder and in Supreme Court said they knew about her whereabouts and did not intend to arrest her.

Those who commit violent crimes will be drawn, hung, disemboweled, entrails burnt, beheaded and quartered. There will be caning or flogging for minor crimes. For some crimes there will be imprisonment or fine.

Farmers are free to export cotton, garlic, onion, potatoes, sugar, tomatoes and make profits. Industrialists should not benefit at the cost of farmers.

If any panchayat kills people all members of that panchayat will be buried alive and the village will be flattened and made a dumping ground.

Government will do its job in education. Private unaided and minority institutions will not be compelled to reserve 25% seats.

Taxes will come down by 1% per year. A time will come when no Indian will have to pay any tax. Anti-dumping duty may be there for imports less than cost price.

I will root out corruption. Any public servant who demands or accepts bribe will be buried alive. All public servants who took bribes up to now and all people who gave them bribes have 90 days to give declarations and they will have imprisonment or fine and will not be buried alive.

If any Indian anywhere or a foreigner in India is taken hostage we will begin rescue operation immediately and the hostage will be freed alive or dead. Hostage takers will be killed. Their bodies will be dumped into the sea or river or left on land to be eaten by beasts and birds. There should be no criticism of this policy on any TV channel and if I hear any criticism I will send a missile and destroy that channel.”

At this point one panelist says “My goodness, this is too terrible. I am leaving.” Soon other panelists follow. Then the anchor follows. The cameraman leaves and the channel is blacked out.