Voice from the Rooftop

Blog of Vincent Augustine D'Souza

Trayvon Martin case

In USA in a black versus white case looking at the composition of jury one can foretell the verdict. If the majority of the jury is white the verdict goes in favour of white person. That happened in Rodney King case. If the majority of the jury is black the verdict goes in favour of black person. That happened in O. J. Simpson case. When the jury for Trayvon Martin case was constituted it was obvious it will be in favour of the white person George Zimmerman as his father was white though he claimed he was Hispanic because his mother was Hispanic. The jury consisted of five white women and one woman who was half black and half Hispanic. Added to that most prosecution witnesses were white who said things that favoured defence. If the jury had consisted five black women and one woman who was half white and half Hispanic the verdict would have been George Zimmerman guilty of murder. If three women had been black and three white there would have been deadlock. The judge was white and her instruction to jury was in favour of white person.
Florida and some states have stand your ground law which allows a person to kill in self-defence. It was meant to protect oneself from burglars or in cases of attack. It was not for following someone, picking up a fight and killing him.
George Zimmerman had shot dead Trayvon Martin on 26/2/2012. Trayvon Martin was walking alone. The police had told George Zimmerman not to follow Trayvon Martin. George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin, picked up a fight, shot him dead, and claimed it was in self-defence. The verdict outraged many Americans. There were protests in Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and other cities. One black protestor said it was back to the ‘50s when white persons thought “It is okay to kill a black person.” There was no violence unlike Rodney King case.
Civil Rights leaders have called the murder of Trayvon Martin a hate crime. Jesse Jackson talked of taking the case to next level.
USA should do away with jury system. Judges should deliver verdicts. For that the legislators should amend the constitution as original Article III prescribes that the Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury.

Advani tantrums

In recent days Lal Krishna Advani has thrown tantrums and caused embarrassment to BJP leaders. Narendra Modi is most popular among BJP members who want him to be BJP’s prime ministerial candidate and Advani wants to counter Modi. BJP spokespersons had tough time to explain Advani’s actions. BJP opponents gloated about the infighting in BJP and some of them after commenting at length on the infighting concluded saying “It is an internal matter of the BJP. I don’t want to comment on it.”
Advani’s ambition of becoming PM remains unfulfilled. For long Atal Behari Vajpayee eclipsed him. In 2009 Advani had his chance. He attacked Manmohan Singh as the weakest PM India ever had. The attack boomeranged as Manmohan Singh reminded him of Kandahar hijack episode. BJP lost the election and it was downhill for Advani after that.
Modi worked on his public relations. He wooed industrialists. Ratan Tata shifting Nano plant from Singur to Sanand was a turning point. Soon other industrialists followed. Anil Ambani compared him to Mohandas Gandhi and Vallabhbhai Patel. Modi got Amitabh Bachchan to propagate Gujarat tourism. Many journalists talked well of Modi.
Many say Advani saved Modi from losing chief ministership in 2002 during BJP national executive in Goa. Arun Shourie said he was in the plane that carried Vajpayee, Advani, Modi and others to Goa. Vajpayee and Advani wanted Modi to resign. During the national executive Modi offered to resign. Then as if on cue people got up and shouted “No, no, absolutely not.” Shourie said “This is what we had discussed.” Members were unrelenting. Modi survived.
During the 2009 campaign Shourie mentioned Modi as the next PM after Advani. Not many in BJP thought Modi as a PM candidate at the time. Over the years many came to see Modi as PM candidate and by the middle of 2012 his position was strong. That made Advani and other PM hopefuls uneasy.
RSS wanted second term as BJP president for Nitin Gadkari. Advani opposed it. Ram Jethmalani, Yashwant Sinha, Jaswant Singh and Shatrughan Sinha also opposed Gadkari. Rajnath Singh became president.
BJP has three allies in NDA; JD(U), SAD, and Shiv Sena. JD(U) leaders opposed Modi as PM candidate. It seemed they were egged on by Modi’s rivals in BJP. Shiv Sena leaders said Bal Thackeray wanted Sushma Swaraj as PM. SAD was neutral.
Advani tried to undercut Modi. He wrote to Rajnath Singh to have two election committees; one for state elections headed by Gadkari and another for Lok Sabha elections headed by Modi. Gadkari refused to head the committee.
Advani praised Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Chouhan said he is no. 3. Modi is no. 1, Raman Singh is no. 2. Manish Tewari commented “Story by Advani ji – Chauhan ji vs Modi ji vs Rajnath ji vs Sushma ji vs Jaitley ji vs Gadkari ji vs RSS vs BJP ji – civil war in Parivar ji.”
Feroze Varun Gandhi mentioned Rajnath Singh as PM candidate. BJP expelled Ram Jethmalani after he attacked BJP MPs for not fighting corrupt Congress.
Advani started throwing tantrums. He did not attend National Executive meeting in Goa. He was supposed to be sick. Some people demonstrated in front of Advani’s house in favour of Modi. Uma Bharti and Feroze Varun Gandhi had informed they would not attend the meeting. Jaswant Singh said he was sick. Yashwant Sinha said he was not sick, but did not attend the meeting for other reasons. At the end of the meeting on 9/6/2013 Modi was declared chairman of the election campaign committee for Lok Sabha elections 2014. Arun Jaitley congratulated Rajnath Singh for the bold decision. Uma Bharti, Yashwant Sinha and others fell in line. Sushma Swaraj left without taking part in the rally. Modi tweeted he spoke to Advani and had his blessings.
On 10/6/2013 Advani resigned from three party posts. He wrote: “Dear Shri Rajnath Singhji,
All my life I have found working for the Jan Sangh and the Bharatiya Janata Party a matter of great pride and endless satisfaction to myself.
For some time I have been finding it difficult to reconcile either with the current functioning of the party, or the direction in which it is going.
I no longer have the feeling that this is the same idealistic party created by Dr. Mookerji, Pandit Deendayalji, Nanaji and Vajpayeeji, whose sole concern was the country, and its people. Most leaders of ours era and now concerned just with their personal agendas.
I have decided, therefore, to resign from the three main fora of the party, namely, the National Executive, the Parliamentary Board, and the Election Committee. This may be regarded as my resignation letter.
Yours sincerely
L K Advani”
Rajnath Singh wanted Advani not to make the resignation letter public but Advani made it public. Rajnath Singh should have written “I accept your resignation wholeheartedly.” Instead he and other BJP leaders tried to persuade Advani to withdraw his resignation. BJP parliamentary board met and rejected the resignation. Advani followers said Advani was not against Modi but RSS interference in BJP affairs. That is a specious argument. RSS has always interfered in BJP affairs. Besides this time it was for Modi’s promotion. Advani was not humiliated. He spent his time in sulk and petulance. It was my way or highway. He had his personal agenda of becoming PM.
On 11/6/2013 Advani withdrew his resignation. At a press conference held at Advan’s house which Advani did not attend Rajnath Singh said Advani heeded RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat’s advice.
Ram Jethmalani said Advani is hungry for power. He wants to be PM. He does not care about the party. He destroyed the party in Karnataka. He will destroy the party in the country. Corrupt Congress will come to power. He has no role in Modi’s rise. BJP members said “All is well that ends well.” The fight for PM candidate can get bitter and split BJP.

Srinivasan wins

What about someone filing a case against TV channels for cheating 1.24 billion Indians by telecast of false news on N. Srinivasan from the evening of Friday 31/5/2013 to 2.30 p.m. on Sunday 2/6/2013? The coverage was over the top. One channel said it was Endgame Srinivasan. Another called it Super Sunday. Other channels had different reports all saying N. Srinivasan was out.
It began with the reports of resignations of Ajay Shirke and Sanjay Jagdale as BCCI treasurer and secretary respectively. Soon there were reports that five vice presidents will resign. However no vice president resigned and East Zone vice president said he will not resign. Around 6.30 p.m. there was news that working committee meeting will take place on 8/6/2013. Some had questioned why such a long time.
On the morning of 1/6/2003 Arun Jaitley said you will hear something significant in a day. Later in the day Anurag Thakur convened BCCI working committee meeting at 11 a.m. on 2/6/2013 in Madras. The time was changed to 2.30 p.m. ostensibly for Arun Jaitley to make it to the meeting. Rajeev Shukla resigned as IPL chairman. One channel called it a quake but it was nothing of that sort. Headlines Today talked of Sharad Pawar plotting a coup against N. Srinivasan.
The meeting took place. Arun Jaitley, Anurag Thakur and Rajeev Shukla attended via video conference in Delhi. Ajay Shirke and Sanjay Jagdale attended via video conference in Bombay. They were special invitees. N. Srinivasan refused to resign. He agreed to step aside till the probe in spot-fixing is over. Jagmohan Dalmiya was to carry on the functions of president. It was a remarkable return for a man who was accused of misappropriation funds, expelled from BCCI and was in jail for some time. Ajay Shirke and Sanjay Jagdale were asked to reconsider their decisions.
After the meeting I. S. Bindra said he asked N. Srinivasan to resign. Nobody else had the guts to ask for his resignation. N. Srinivasan said nobody asked him to resign. It is Bindra’s word against Srinivasan’s. Jagmohan Dalmiya said he did not hear I. S. Bindra ask for N. Srinivasan’s resignation.
Some have questioned the legality of the working committee meeting saying 72 hours notice should have been given and there is no provision for attending via video conference.
After the meeting when reporters asked Rajeev Shukla said I am just an ordinary working committee member. Why do you want to know my opinion? Sharad Pawar said I have nothing to do with cricket.
TV channels had egg on their face. For them it was anti-climax. They should have known better. They should not interpreted statements to suit them. They heard what they wanted to hear. They saw what they wanted to see. They ignored everything else. Someone had said N. Srinivasan will not resign. He will spring a surprise. That statement was ignored.
There is uncertainty about the third member of BCCI probe panel since Sanjay Jagdale refused to be part of it. There are questions about two former judges who are part of the panel. A. C. Muthaiah said both are from South India. N. Ram on CNN-IBN said both judges are unsuitable but did not say why and said he will tell that to Rajdeep Sardesai in private. That is not fair on those former judges.
Some questioned why former cricketers were not speaking. Sunil Gavaskar issued a statement that he is contracted to a channel (NDTV 24×7) and cannot speak to other channels. He answers questions on that channel. What may be immoral to one may not be immoral to another.
Those who failed to oust Srinivasan now targetted Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Anil Kumble for conflict of interest though Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s association with Rhiti Sports and Anil Kumble running coaching camps was public knowledge.
What next? Where do we go from here? How to improved BCCI? I have suggestions.
Only those associations that field Ranji Trophy teams (Baroda, Saurashtra, Hyderabad, Karnataka, Vidarbha etc.) should have voting right in BCCI. Cricket Club of India, National Cricket Club and such associations that do not field Ranji Trophy teams should not have voting right in BCCI.
The officials of BCCI and associations should have some qualifications as cricketers.
The president of BCCI should have played at least 50 Tests for India.
Other officials of BCCI like vice presidents, secretary, treasurer, joint secretary should have played at least 25 Tests for India.
I say Tests for India because I don’t want cricketers who have played for other countries to hold those positions.
Officials of associations that field Ranji Trophy teams should have played at least 25 Ranji Trophy/ Duleep Trophy/Irani Trophy matches or Tests/ODIs or T20s representing associations or India. Members of such associations should have played at least 10 Ranji Trophy or other first class matches.

Page 50 of 249« First...102030...4849505152...607080...Last »
Voice from the Rooftop | Vincent Augustine D'Souza © 2005-2016 Frontier Theme